
SoftMaker Office 2010
Reviewed May, 2010
What’s It Do?
The suite consists of 4 programs: TextMaker 2010 is a word
processor that reads and writes Microsoft Word documents;
PlanMaker 2010 is a fully Excel-compatible spreadsheet
application to create worksheets; Presentations 2010 creates
graphic presentation programs; and, BasicMaker 2010 is a
scripting language and environment that enables the user to
automate recurring tasks.
Does it do what it promises?
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request. Yes. SoftMaker Office
2010 accurately reads, processes and saves its own, or
Microsoft’s, word processing, spreadsheet, or presentation
files.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: SoftMaker Office 2010 is a less
expensive alternative to that “other” well-known office suite.
At about $80 US, it is considerably cheaper than the Microsoft
Office Suite. The SoftMaker suite is offered in versions for
Windows and Linux in the 2010 release and for Windows Mobile and
Windows CE in the 2008 version.
SoftMaker responds: Beta for
2010 for Windows Mobile starts second week of May, 2010.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: Yes. The SoftMaker Office Suite offers
programs compatible to the MS Office set: TextMaker (Word),
PlanMaker (Excel) and Presentation (PowerPoint). Although there
are some differences in the Menu and Toolbars, it is not
difficult to move from the MS Set to SoftMaker Office. There are
two additional modules. "BasicMaker" can be used to create
scripts or programs to automate repetitive tasks in SoftMaker
Office. "Explorer" gives quick access from its icon in the
System Tray to some of the most often-used features of Windows
(the Desktop, Start Menu, Recent Documents, Control Panel, etc)
as well as some of the options of the whole SoftMaker Office
suite.
SoftMaker responds: That program is called “SMASH” (SoftMaker
Application Shell).
Reviewer 4 – Mark Snyder: Yes. This is an office suite that
rivals Microsoft Office only, it is less expensive, less
resource hungry, much smaller, and much, much faster. The suite
contains four applications. TextMaker is a word processor nearly
identical to Microsoft Word; PlanMaker is a spreadsheet
application similar to Excel; a slideshow application that is
called Presentations and very similar to PowerPoint; and a
programming language macro creation tool called BasicMaker. As
promised, the program’s applications were near seamless in their
ability to read and write all major file formats and thus
offered near full interoperability with these Microsoft
products.
Was it easy to install?
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request. This was one of the
biggest/longest downloads I have encountered. It took between 15
and 20 minutes to download over a DSL connection.
The first time it ran, it asked for the name, email address, and
registration code which had been sent via email in order to
register the software. This was accepted fine, but then I got a
Warning window with message "No Printer driver installed or
no default printer selected. Please install a driver if you want
to be able to print" appeared despite my having multiple
printers installed and having a default printer set.
This happened on my initial installation on Windows XP (SP3). It
did not occur with a subsequent installation under Windows 7.
SoftMaker responds: It seems the default printer on this system
is the “Generic/Text only”. This printer driver cannot print at
all, it is just a placeholder, so it is a safety net for the
customer.
I appreciated was that the installation gave full control over
whether to associate file types with it. Thus allowing a user to
run this suite while leaving competing software to run
unaffected if so desired.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: Like many applications, this one
offered three levels of installation: Typical, Custom and
Complete. As usual, I chose the “custom” offering so that I
could see and choose exactly what was getting installed. The
actual installation was very straightforward and typical. I had
no problems. During the installation there are several “decision
points” that need to be addressed. Items such as which file
extension associations to create that will then open with the
appropriate SoftMaker module. On opening TextMaker the first
time, additional information is required for later document
creation and two separate identities may be created, one
personal and one for business that have different data.
During the installation, this application attempts to install a
feature called “Smash” as a startup item to place icons for each
of the four modules in the system tray on startup. All programs
should ask before installing any startup items and give the
option to choose not to do so. There is an option to not install
Smash but there is no explanation of what it is so one can
intelligently make the decision.
SoftMaker responds: Point well
taken. We are changing the setup program at this moment to give
more details about what SMASH does. We will also default to “not
install” SMASH on Windows 7, since most of its functionality is
now available through regular Windows 7 means.
The actual install folder for SoftMaker was quite extensive,
containing entries for each of the four applications and a
folder called “Documentation” containing a complete user manual
for each application as well as a folder called “Utilities” the
contained the Smash application, a link to SoftMaker on the web
as well as instructions for installing the suite on a USB key.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: Yes. The installation file is about
130 MB, and took 17 minutes to download on a fast cable
connection. The "Custom" installation procedure is similar to
that of other Suites such as Open Office or MS Office. It
allowed me to select the features I wanted to include; for
example, I was able to chose two versions of English (British
and US) and French, from the languages available. The only
choice I was not able to make was where I wanted the program
files to be located.
SoftMaker responds:
This is not correct.
When you choose a “Custom install”, there is a “Browse” button
at the bottom of the installation options. This button allows
the user to choose an arbitrary folder for the program files.
Once the installation was completed, there were five new icons
in my system tray: one for each of the applications, and one for
Soft Office Explorer. There is a manual in pdf format for each
of the SoftMaker modules: (TextMaker, PlanMaker, Presentations
and BasicMaker), each of which only took a few seconds to
download.
Reviewer 4 – Mark Snyder: Yes. While it is not a small download
at 132MB and does require 230MB of disc space, it is tiny
compared to its competitor, Microsoft Office that is a 288MB
download and requires a whopping 2GB of drive space! There is a
standard wizard to aid in installation that was smooth and
event-free as was the registration. There is a minimum of
configuration necessary with most default options properly
checked. I was surprised that it wanted to place itself in my
start folder and offered no desktop icon. The EULA (End user
License Agreement) was by far the most intelligible,
straightforward, and liberal license I have seen in a long
time—maybe ever. There was no legalese or threats, and each
license allows for use of the software on three computers. This
liberal licensing is enough, all things being equal, to make
this program one hard to pass up. The program uninstalls
relatively cleanly for the size of the program, leaving only a
few remnants in the Registry. One word of caution however: If
one uses an aggressive uninstaller such as Revo or JV16
Powertools that cleans the Registry as a part of the uninstall
process, each entry should be checked carefully since there may
not be a differentiation between SoftMaker Office and other
installed office programs such as Microsoft Office or Open
Office.
Good points.
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request: Those familiar with
Microsoft Office will be quickly comfortable with the programs
in SoftMaker Office 2010. The suite contains a word processor,
spreadsheet, slide presentation program, and a scripting
program.
I used TextMaker, the word processor, much more often than the
other programs in everyday use. I found it to be easy to use and
generally intuitive. A short browse through the menus allowed me
to set my general preferences for how I like my word processors
to work. The most notable customizations I made were control of
automatic backups and turning on automatic spell checking as I
type (which was turned off by default).
All of the Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files I opened
with SoftMaker Office displayed and ran easily and accurately.
Formatting, charting, formula entry, layout, and text entry all
performed without difficulty.
There are some advanced tools to get repetitive processes
automated and streamlined. For example, opening a new document
presents a menu of templates for various common document types
(letters, memo’s, fax, etc) as well as options to prefill
sections of the document with information stored on an internal
database, e.g., recipient’s name, address, salutation, etc). For
the extreme limit of automation, BasicMaker is SoftMaker’s
scripting program. It appears very similar in structure to the
Basic programming language and can perform powerful manipulation
of text and numeric data from a wide range of sources.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: After using Microsoft Word,
PowerPoint and Excel as well as similar offerings from Open
Office for many years, I found this application both familiar
and just a bit different in some ways but, overall, quite easy
to use. It easily handled all the various Word documents, Excel
spreadsheets and PowerPoint slideshows that I tried. It is a
very suitable and much less expensive option to the full-on
office suite from Microsoft.
Once I referred to the help files to locate what was different,
The word processor and spreadsheet application were very easy to
use and worked as expected with some exceptions. (see “weak
points” below).
I enjoyed using SoftMaker Presentations, the PowerPoint analog,
to create several slide shows about my newest puppy. All the
options for backgrounds, styles, transitions and formatting were
easy to use and apply. The pictures imported well and were
easily resized inside the program to fit the screen area needed.
there was a large selection of styles, backgrounds, fonts and
transitions, video, and audio available.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: I started my word processing career
many "eons" ago with Bank Street Writer, and then moved to
WordStar; my first spreadsheet was VisiCalc. Since those
long-ago 5½” floppy disk days, I have used quite a variety of
Word Processing and Spreadsheet programs. In the struggle for
markets, Word and Excel have become the dominant winners in the
competition, so their formats have become ubiquitous. Of
necessity, then, the most important feature of any possible
alternative program to the MS Office suite is its ability to
read and write to the .doc and all the other Office formats.
With the 2007 version of the MS Behemoth come new formats, not
compatible with the old ones, so one must buy the new MS
offering, or go through hoops to be able to just read those new
files. One of the greatest pleasures of using the SoftMaker
Suite is that it handles all of the MS Office files, from older
ones to the newest ones. With no effort, one can open all those
file, and write them back to disk in the newest as well as the
older MS file formats, or in the SoftMaker format, if desired.
Any of my previous documents that had been prepared either with
MS Office or with OpenOffice.org Write opened easily with
SoftMaker Office, as did any PowerPoint documents.
Any SoftMaker Office file can be saved in .pdf format directly
from the Toolbar or from the File Menu. As with many of the
other SoftMaker functions, with “Export as PDF”, there are a
number of options that can be set before the pdf file is saved
to disk.
The Menu structure, the features and the functions of the
SoftMaker Office Suite are all comparable to MS Office, but not
exactly the same. As with any new program, one must sometimes
search a bit to find a particular function that is not
necessarily in the same place as it would be in the MS Set. When
I got stuck looking for a feature that I could not find, I could
get rapid assistance from the SoftMaker Forum. On one occasion,
the MS Office feature did not exist in SoftMaker. The developers
told me so, and another user chimed in explaining why he hated
that particular function in MS Word, and was happy that it is
not in TextMaker.
Any time that I had a question about the program, I turned to
the SoftMaker Forum. Taking into consideration the difference in
time zones, answers from the developers themselves, were usually
posted within one hour of my submission. The fact that they are
carefully monitoring the forum speaks to their interest in the
questions that users have, as well as other comments. In fact,
not only is there the forum and direct support available by
email, there is also a specific page for feedback, ideas and
suggestions about their programs. According to the information
on their Web site, the company has been in existence since 1987,
with the development of Word Processing programs as the core of
their business. The fact that they are still responding to their
users and that they are continuing to develop their programs
indicates that SoftMaker Office will continue to be here for
some time.
One of the unexpected surprises that I have had with SoftMaker
is the variety of fonts that are available. When I first
installed the program, I could also add a dozen or so new, free
fonts. New fonts are made available on a regular basis.
The licencing offered by SoftMaker could be a model for other
software developers, and suits my own needs perfectly. From the
licence agreement: You may EITHER install and use one copy of
the Software on up to 3 (three) computers simultaneously, so
long as all of these computers belong to the same household or
company at the same physical location; ALTERNATIVELY, you may
install one copy of the Software on up to 5 (five) computers
that are owned by the same person or company, so long as only
one copy of the Software is in use at any given time. You can
move the program from one computer to another, and so on,
without the program "checking home" or using other methods that
suggest that they do not trust their users of trying to cheat
them.
Reviewer 4 – Mark Snyder: This is a near clone of Microsoft
Office programs and as such, and for the sake of brevity, I will
assume that most readers of these reviews are familiar with how
those programs look so I will not spend time detailing the
workings of each program. Suffice it to say that the user
familiar with Word, Excel, or PowerPoint will be using their SoftMaker counterparts in just a few seconds; and what can be
done on those Microsoft programs can as easily be done (more
easily in many instances) with the SoftMaker equivalents. Even
the GUI (Graphic User Interface) will look relatively familiar.
So, I will simply point out those items, which I think make this
a better, or at least equal, choice to its competitors.
Price: This program retails for $80.00 as compared to $400.00
for its equivalent Microsoft Office product. And while there is
no email program, I think this is more than offset by the
$320.00 in savings.
Size, resource usage, and speed: This program weighs in at a
slender 132MB as opposed to 388MB for the Microsoft program; the
disc space required is 230MB as compared to a huge 2G for
Microsoft Office; it requires only 64MB of RAM memory as opposed
to the 256MB required as a (unrealistic) minimum for Microsoft;
it used approximately 50% less memory while running with, for
example, TextMaker consuming approximately 12MB of RAM compared
to Microsoft Word using 30MB on average. Finally, unlike its
counterpart, the SoftMaker application opens in literally 2-3
seconds and is generally blazingly fast in use.
SoftMaker offers as a standard part of each application a PDF
creation tool to export to PDF in every application, something
that is not available in Microsoft Office.
TextMaker offers an excellent spell-checker, a reasonable
thesaurus, a language translator, and an easy-to-use drop down
box for those always hard to find special characters hidden in
Microsoft Word.
Presentation has all of the features expected in PowerPoint
including the use of DirectX technologies for creating
attractive animations and transitions.
The entire application can be run from a thumb drive. Try that
with Microsoft Office!
Support: There is email support as well as by telephone, but
be aware that this is not a toll-free number and it is an
international call to Germany; however, the chances of needing
either of these two types of support is highly unlikely as there
is an exceptional users forum which seems to be constantly
manned by the developers. It has over 2,000 registered members,
over 17,000 posts, is extremely active, and support questions
are answered seven days a week—often as quickly as in two hours
or less. In addition, there is a developer’s blog that offers
news as well as tips; a newsletter, a “Tips & Tricks” section on
the Web Site, excellent help files, and downloadable user’s
manuals for each of the separate applications.
Again, each of the above applications worked well in my testing.
This is really an exceptional office suite that can easily
replace the bloated and expensive Microsoft Office products, and
has none of the interoperability problems of many of the free
office programs such as Open Office.
Weak points.
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request: This
program suite is well designed to go head-to-head against
Microsoft Office, but does not substitute well for other
competitors such as Corel’s suite that includes WordPerfect and
QuattroPro. I have a complex spreadsheet that I designed with
QuattroPro but I could find no way to import it or open it.
While the look and feel of this software was familiar and
comfortable, some of the keyboard shortcuts were different than
those of MS Office. During months of use with this suite, I was
not able to break the habit of hitting the keyboard
combinations, most notable of which was the “Alt+E,F”
combination to search for text within a document. SoftMaker’s
equivalent combination, “Alt+E, H” was one, which I just could
not adjust to. When I found the “Keyboard Mappings” function, I
attempted to change the shortcut to my preference. While it did
accept and register my preferred keyboard shortcut, it did not
work when I returned to the main part of the program.
Templates can be chosen for a variety of document formats. The
main weakness I found here was that choosing the template was a
“blind process”; i.e. there was no preview available to show the
format of the document.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: While no major
problems were discovered, there were some moderate to minor
annoyances that I did find:
When opening an existing Word document that had “pen”
annotations such as a written signature, the annotations were
not included or were only partially there;
While it may be something particular to my setup’s security
software or user account control, I got continuous “warnings”
every time I opened the programs that stated that it was trying
to “modify a critical item”;
The spell checker seemed to be very intrusive and I finally
turned it off. It seemed to have some inherent lag or something
that was causing it to trigger just a little bit late and
subsequently insert corrections at the end of the line rather
than as the flagged word. This annoying behavior is apparently
quite common and has been commented on in the Forum;
SoftMaker
responds: I am totally unaware of any such issue, let
alone one being commented upon in the Forum. I am genuinely
interested in finding out what’s going on. Are you willing to
contact me about this? (email address provided to Reviewer)
TextMaker did not recognize keyboard ANSI commands for special
characters, so in order to insert a special character one must
use the drop-down insert symbol menu. This can be problematic
for someone accustomed to using the keyboard shortcuts for these
symbols.
None of the applications were “pen aware” meaning that they did
not recognize any type of digital stylus input correctly or at
all;
There is no ability to format a range of cells as a group in a
spreadsheet or worksheet. I often build spreadsheets to keep
track of miscellaneous data. Some of this data has a + symbol as
the first character. PlanMaker automatically flagged this as a
calculation cell and messed up my input. Apparently, there is a
workaround for this on a limited, cell-by-cell basis by putting
an apostrophe in front of the first character. While this is
doable, it is not a very elegant nor satisfactory solution;
SoftMaker
responds: It is also possible to switch from automatic
recognition to text mode by pressing Ctrl+Shift+F4.
The program is a resource hog and all of the applications
contained in the SoftMaker suite are very resource intensive.
The saves were painfully slow and I saw resource consumption of
up to 48% of CPU power at times. This is not a heavily graphical
application and there is no reason they should consume as much
of one’s computing power, even on a 2.4 gigahertz dual core
machine with three gigs of RAM.
SoftMaker
responds: Very strange. This is in total contradiction
to what the other testers in this review said, and also in
contradiction to our own experience. I wonder if there is
something special in this tester’s setup that causes this.
SoftMaker Office even runs beautifully on small Pocket PCs, so
there should be no reason whatsoever it should be sluggish on a
2.4 GHz dual core machine. Again, I offer to investigate this.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: I have very few complaints about this
program, so I am limited more to suggestions than to real
criticisms. In other spreadsheet programs, clicking on the “=”
button in the toolbar begins a formula. With PlanMaker, this
brings up a dialog box with a number of different options, which
usually complicates, rather than simplifies, the process of
making one of my elementary little calculations; however, I
eventually found that using the”=” key on the keyboard allowed
me to start my formula without the extra dialog box.
I often use the free OpenOffice.org program in place of the MS
Suite, so I have many files that I have saved in those formats.
Fortunately, TextMaker can open edit the Open Office Write files
directly, without any intervening steps; however, it cannot open
the Calc (.ods) format. If I wish to use PlanMaker to work on
files that I have previously created with OpenOffice Calc, I
have first to use Calc to save them as Excel (.xls) files, then
open those files with PlanMaker. Apparently, the SoftMaker
developers have OpenOffice Calc in their future plans. I do hope
that they will move this one up the wish list.
As the Forum is such a good resource, I would like to see a
direct link to it under the Help Menu, in addition to the link
that is already there to the SoftMaker Web site.
Reviewer 4 – Mark Snyder: I almost hesitate to
mention any weaknesses or areas I think need improvement because
I suspect they might have been corrected by the time this review
is published. This seems to be the kind of constant and
continual attention to development given to this program.
One application which I have barely mentioned and that is the
programming language program called BasicMaker. Quite frankly, I
think this is a waste of space and resources and might be better
served if offered as an optional add-on or sold separately. It
is essentially a programming tool based on BASIC, a simple if
verbose syntax that has been around forever; however, it can not
produce stand-alone applications and is really only a scripting
engine for making macros within the SoftMaker applications. The
problem is that, although not a full programming application, it
still requires a fairly high level of knowledge with general
programming—especially application coding—but offers no true
tutorial or serious help. For example, in Flow Control it
discusses types of “loop” and assumes that one knows what that
term means in programming language. I suspect 99% of people
purchasing this program have no idea what I am talking about
here.
SoftMaker
responds: I agree :-). It’s a tool for advanced users.
But we shall soon be introducing a concept called “SoftMaker
Office Extensions (similar to what Firefox offers) that will
extend the feature set of our applications with specialized
features. These extensions will be available in BasicMaker
source code, making them a great learning source for budding
macro writers.
Pagination was changed and was different when opening the same
document in TextMaker and Office 2007.
TextMaker has some difficulty with handling smart quotes in that
it does not always recognize the appropriateness of single
quotes when used with double quotes, for example ‘.”
There were occasional slow downs when scrolling through
documents in TextMaker when they contained several graphics.
SoftMaker
responds: This should be addressed in Revision 584 that
was released May 6, 2010. You can download a free service pack
by selecting Help/Check for Upgrades in our applications.
There needs to be a split screen option available in TextMaker
for doing side-by-side checking and comparisons.
I was unable to decode Microsoft Office 2007 spreadsheets
properly using PlanMaker.
SoftMaker
responds: PlanMaker does have support for XLSX import,
and Revision 584 is much improved in this regard. If 584 does
not fix your problem, I would love to see the offending file.
Developer's Web site.
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request: The Web
site is a bit heavy on promises and generalities in the opening
pages but does get down to details as one drills down. There is
a forum with sections dedicated to each program in the suite.
Representatives from the company are active in responding to
questions on the forum and often indicate that issues brought up
on the forum result in changes in subsequent releases.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: The SoftMaker Web
site was minimalist to the point of almost being Spartan. It was
easy to navigate and find the information that I was looking
for, so it serves its purpose quite well.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: It is a very well
laid-out Web site. There is a "path" diagram -- something like a
"site map" -- across the top of all the pages on the site. This
let me see exactly where I am, and allows quick access to the
other pages on the site. There are little corners that I found
interesting. One is a small Tips and Tricks section. Another is
the Product timeline, that goes back to the 1987 DOS-based
TextMaker 1.0 word processor program. The site is not cluttered
up with annoying, flashy banners or panels on the side,
extolling the virtues of their products. Although they certainly
are promoting their programs, they are also providing useful
information and helpful links to people interesting in learning
about SoftMaker. There is a monthly newsletter as well as a
blog.
Reviewer 4 – Mark Snyder: The Web site is
professional in appearance, well laid out, easy to navigate, and
does not contain a lot of superfluous snippets from anonymous
reviewers that only detracts from the credibility of a product.
I want to especially commend the developers on making the
License Agreement available for reading and printing on the Web
Site. This allows a user to inspect the terms of any purchase
before the purchase, which is the right way to do things.
Other comments.
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request: There is
no database program included in this suite. An employee on the
forum reports that there is one in beta testing but that it is a
long way from release. Three computers are licensed to run this
suite in the purchase price. A free 30-day trial installation is
also available.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: Over the several
month time frame during which I was testing the software at
least one update was offered, possibly more. My version number
went from 573 of the original install to version number 579 that
occurred a week or two ago.
In spite of a few annoyances, I had no problem making a
comfortable transition to this suite of applications as my
full-time word processor, spreadsheet and slide presentation
software. It saves me from the need to update my 2003 version of
Microsoft’s Office to the latest version Office 2010 at some
considerable expense.
SoftMaker offers support primarily via its online Forum. There
is also an email option.
I used both. The email turn around was fast with a reply in
three hours. The Forum took a bit longer with my question
answered the next day. Since SoftMaker is located in Germany,
there will be some time zone issues.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: There is a 30-day
trial. Writing to Microsoft Office file formats is allowed only
during the first seven days.
SoftMaker
responds: We have since removed the 7-days limitation.
Now the trial can be used for 30 days, with all features staying
enabled.
Updates come in the form of Service Packs and I received notices
of new service packs via email. They are also available under
Help Menu > Check for Updates. During the five months that I
have been using this program, I had several updates, so it is
clear that SoftMaker is under continuing development and
improvement. Service Pack installations were very simple. It
took 2-3 seconds to do the actual update, faster than the
download itself.
I am not a "power user" of the Office set. My needs are fairly
modest, and most of the functions in the MS Office suite simply
wasted hard disk space on my computer. When I have had to
reformat my computer and reinstall my programs, the struggle to
wrestle the Office onto my computer is always an exercise in
frustration. So, it is certainly a pleasure to find a program
such as this one that installs easily and does all I need. At
its full price, it is competitive with the student cost of MS
Office. Better, SoftMaker offers educational pricing which
brings the cost of this program down to the same price level as
many other, much simpler programs. I note that SoftMaker has
announced the development of a new Database program that should
soon be available for beta testing (usually the stage before a
program is stable enough to be released to the public). With my
experience with the current modules of the SoftMaker Office, I
am looking forward to this new addition to the suite.
Reviewer 4: Mark Snyder: This Nuremberg,
Germany company has been in constant development of this program
for a number of years and seems not only proud of and dedicated
to the program but dedicated to its customers. This is evident
by its almost hourly interaction with its customers on the user
forum as well as in its solicitation of customer comments on the
Web site. This is the kind of company with which one wants to do
business. This, when combined with a solid program at a price
that is a fraction of its competitor’s, makes it easy for me to
recommend this program fully.
Will you continue to use it?
Reviewer 1 – Name withheld by request: While I
like using SoftMaker Office 2010, it essentially duplicates the
Microsoft Office functionality I already have. Since MS Office
has the added functionality of a database (MS Access) I will
probably prefer to keep the Microsoft suite and remove SoftMaker
Office. I may install it on another computer where I do not have
an office suite installed. For one making a new purchasing
decision, I would not hesitate to recommend SoftMaker Office
2010.
Reviewer 2 – Dana Bostick: As I mentioned
above, I already have the full Microsoft Office Suite 2003
version installed on all of my computers. There really is no
compelling need for me to change at this point as it is working
fine. If I were in the market for a suite of applications such
as this one, SoftMaker would definitely be a contender since it
is fully functional and considerably lower priced.
Reviewer 3 – Peter Royle: Yes. I am now using
it for most of my "Office Suite" needs.
Reviewer 4 – Mark Snyder: Yes. Once my Windows
XP and copy of Word 2003 on my desktop finally gives up, I see
no reason to upgrade to another bloated and over-priced Windows
program when all that I need is right here in SoftMaker Office
2010. |
OPERATING SYSTEMS USED IN THIS REVIEW
Windows 7, Vista Home Premium, XP Pro, XP Home, XP Media Center
Edition
Back
|